The BP Hurricane oil Katrina spill
Up until last week, 2.1 million gallons of crude oil per day had been pouring into the Gulf of Mexico. Since then BP and the Coast Guard have done some to siphon the leak, yet millions of gallons of oil, in hundreds of thousands of patches, float throughout the Gulf. They hurt and threaten tourism, fishing, and ecology. BP suggests that the leak might be almost completely stopped within a month. However, nothing is really certain of the future of the leak or the spill and its effects.
People think President Obama could be doing a better job addressing the oil spill. Obama spent the end of April and the beginning of May meeting behind closed doors with administrative officials and BP representatives. He made occasional and vague public statements about the incident. He also spent time vacationing, meeting with NCAA champions, and attending Democratic fundraisers. But it was not until the end of May that he nominally and authoritatively positioned the federal government in charge of the disaster. As of June 3rd he had only visited the region three times.
There is a reasonable temptation to compare Obama and the BP oil spill with Bush and Katrina. The oil spill and Katrina took place in the same area of the country within a relatively short period of time from each other. During the first two days of flooding and chaos in New Orleans, George Bush did not communicate very well with the leaders of Louisiana, New Orleans, and other important agencies. Obama has not communicated well with BP. Bush overestimated the governments of Louisiana and New Orleans’ ability to manage the problem at all, as has Obama with BP.
The right and left are engaged in intense hypocrisy — as often happens when the roles between the two are reversed in sequential administrations — arguing that there is no comparison, that one handled his disaster worse than the other. The right, who thought the media attacked Bush unfairly during Katrina, is down Obama’s throat for the oil spill. And the left, who would not give Bush any benefit of the doubt, is coming up with excuse after excuse for Obama.
The fact is that the situations are not so comparable. Bush reacted much quicker than Obama. Bush declared a state of emergency before the hurricane hit. He activated the National Guard, and addressed the nation all within the first two days of disaster. Once it was clear that chaos had broken out, the White House scrambled to get the federal government more involved. Obama’s reaction has been less urgent by weeks, almost months.
The situations are not comparable for another reason, this one not so favorable to W. Hurricane Katrina was down right more calamitous. The oil spill will undoubtedly cause people to lose their jobs. Wild life is going to suffer and the local economies are going to tank. And who knows what the oil spill will do ecologically? However, human lives were lost in Katrina on the spot. It may take 10 years for the effects of the oil spill to be reconciled, but New Orleans and the families affected will never be the same, not in their lifetime. Bush had to be quicker because of the stakes.
So in the end, the two leaders were just not quick enough, whether it was a day late or a month. Nevertheless, once he got going, Bush probably did everything a President could do in that situation, which was to authorize resources, release statements, and make appearances. And it seems Obama is now finally doing the same. Is it possible that we expect too much from these guys when something like this happens? Do we expect the President to emerge from closed-door meetings with a silver bullet in one hand and a bullhorn in the other?
And as much as I cannot stand Rachael Maddow, she made a good point the other night. For all the investment that BP does in drilling research and finding new sources of oil and energy, they invest nothing, and have made little progress in risk management — i.e. protocols and technologies to prevent and minimize the effects of disasters like this. In fact, the same could be said for the entire human race concerning the fields of medicine, space, and communications. We spend way too much of our intellectual, economic, and human resources into developing technologies that prosper under perfect conditions, but do little to invest in risk management and or societal responsibility. I guess it just doesn’t pay to plan for failure. Right BP?
Latest posts by Robert O'Hara (Posts)
- The dawn of Syrian conflict - August 29, 2013
- Of Russian resets and NSA leaks - August 12, 2013
- Too much news is good news for Mullah Omar - July 25, 2013
- Trayvon Martin, tragedy and injustice - July 14, 2013
- Republican hangover: it’s not the message, it’s the messenger - November 15, 2012
Print This Post
BP = Bullshit Petroleum
I find it interesting that there is a public cry for Obama to “feel our pain” and “show his anger.”
We hired a calm, Harvard intellectual for the Oval Office and that’s what we got. After 8 years of hysterics, I find that refreshing. Not the crisis, just the tone being set.
This short satire video makes my point:
http://bit.ly/cGObyC
Whenever I hear or see complaints that some public figure doesn’t “feel” or act in the way large sections of the public or press think the person should feel or act, I think of the movie about the Australian woman, played by Meryl Streep, who went to prison purely because she didn’t feel or act like large sections of the public thought she should, not because she was guilty of any crime.
The Gulf of Mexico is estimated to contain 650 Quadrillion gallons of water. (1)
Weight of Oil (in mg/L) : 3,200,000 (2)
Do the math:
3.785 L / 1 Gal means that we’ve got 2,460,250,000,000,000 L of water in the Gulf and that we’ve got 7,948,500 L of oil from the spill.
Given the weight in mg of oil, we’ve got 25,435,200,000,000 milligrams of oil in the Gulf from the spill.
25,435,200,000,000 mg oil / 2,460,250,000,000,000 L of water in Gulf gives us a parts per million (ppm) of .00000103385.
That’s so insignificant that I doubt we could even detect it without ultra powerful equipement, when viewed as a whole.
The oil from the spill doesn’t contaminate the Gulf to the point where it would be considered unsafe to drink (assuming it was fresh water).
Nitrate, which causes Blue Baby Syndrome should an infant drink enough of it, is considered safe at 10 ppm… We’re dealing with a concentration of .00000103 ppm resulting from the spill.
It’s really not that bad, when you look at the math. If oil and water didn’t seperate themselves, we’d never even know it was there.
1 – http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_many_gallons_of_water_are_in_the_Gulf_of_Mexico
2 – http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_much_does_one_gallon_of_crude_oil_weigh
“It’s really not that bad, when you look at the math.”
That’s a relief. All the shrimp fishermen and other fishermen and residents who depend upon tourists coming to their tar-balled beaches and people who tend to the wildlife — once they get out their calculators and do the math — can breathe a lot easier. Well, maybe when they breathe it will seem a bit oily-smelling, but it’s really not that bad. And they can’t smell it in London, anyway.
It’s still a virtually insignificant amount of oil when compared to the amount of water.
The people who are complaining about the spill, on both the left (attacking CEOs) and the right (attacking Obama), need to stop driving their cars before I’ll take their bellyaching seriously.
Betcha those fishermen are still driving their cars…
Interesting infograph here:
http://www.iglucruise.com/oil-spill-timeline
I only gave it a cursory look-through, but it seems to add some interesting perspective.
“The people who are complaining about the spill . . . need to stop driving their cars before I’ll take their bellyaching seriously.”
Of course they’re still driving cars. It’s the only way to get around. That is a doltish comment.
People who complain about denuding our forests need to stop using products made of wood before I’ll take their bellyaching seriously.
People who complain about strip-mining of coal need to stop using electricity from coal-fired plants before
I’ll take their bellyaching seriously.
People who complain about whaling need to stop using boats or other vessels when on water before I’ll take their bellyaching seriously.
People who complain about people who complain need to stop using sophistic arguments before I’ll take their bellyaching seriously.